Changes for 2024; Part One – Defense

While people are still somewhat engaged, I thought it’d be a good time to address any changes we want to make for next year. I am open to (realistic) suggestions, which I can present moving forward, but for now, this seems to be the thing that most need to be voted on.

Team D vs. IDP

Though some of it is done in jest just to spike my blood pressure (my children thank you by the way), there has been A LOT of talk the last two years about totally dismantling the entire identity of the league and going to a more generic Team D setting. So there are some things to discuss; first if we should switch, or even eliminate defense – and how scoring would/should change.

Now if we switch to Team D, Chris and I will need to do some research and testing to figure out how the scoring would scale. But if we keep IDP, I think the scoring still needs to be tweaked. A couple years ago we devalued tackles (to the rage of the Skippers) and to put more emphasis on splash plays; Sacks, FF, INTs, etc. Now with a couple years of data, while it did do what was intended, seeing more of the league’s Defensive stars finish towards the top of scoring, with fewer LBs on bad teams you’ve never heard of dropping 300 a week, it also made IDP more boom or bust than it used to be. Greater number of 400 point games, and way too many sub-100 point games. I would recommend tweaking it again. If we keep IDP, I would like to split the difference on both Solo and Assisted Tackles, and knock off a few points on stuff like Sacks and INTs. Still emphasising splash plays, but not devaluing the tackling game so much.

Maybe something like this; along with several examples of how it would change outlooks for some players…

Solo Assist Sack TFL INT PD FF FR DTD
2020 20 10 50 10 60 20 40 40 100
2023 15 5 70 15 70 30 50 50 100
2024 17.5 7.5 60 15 60 30 50 40 100
TJ Watt 41 17 17 16 1 18 4 3 1
2800 820 170 850 160 60 360 160 120 100
3190 615 85 1190 240 70 540 200 150 100
3125 717.5 127.5 1020 240 60 540 200 120 100
Zaire Franklin 97 63 1.5 3 0 5 2 0 0
2855 1940 630 75 30 0 100 80 0 0
2170 1455 315 105 45 0 150 100 0 0
2555 1697.5 472.5 90 45 0 150 100 0 0
Alex Anzalone 72 40 3 6 0 6 0 1 0
2210 1440 400 150 60 0 120 0 40 0
1810 1080 200 210 90 0 180 0 50 0
2050 1260 300 180 90 0 180 0 40 0
Azeez Al-Shaair 75 70 2 8 0 4 0 1 0
2280 1500 350 140 120 0 120 0 50 0
2125 1125 700 100 80 0 80 0 40 0
2237.5 1312.5 525 120 120 0 120 0 40 0
DaRon Bland 47 15 0 3 8 15 0 1 5
2440 940 150 0 30 480 300 0 40 500
2385 705 75 0 45 560 450 0 50 500
2450 822.5 112.5 0 45 480 450 0 40 500
Maxx Crosby 50 32 13.5 20 0 2 1 1 0
2315 1000 320 675 200 0 40 40 40 0
2315 750 160 945 300 0 60 50 50 0
2375 875 240 810 300 0 60 50 40 0

So as you can see on these charts (if any of you actually look at them), the proposed changes would help to avoid such frequent duds, while still rewarding the high end guy for splash plays. TJ Watt drops less than 100 points here, but is still 325 better than the 2020 scoring had him. And the flip of that, Franklin, who would have had over 2800 in 2020 despite very few splash plays, is still well below that total, while being significantly more valuable than he was in 2023. DeRon Bland and his Jesus-like 5 Def. TDs is actually MORE valuable in the 2024 system, and Maxx Crosby (who somehow scores exactly the same in 2020 and 2023 scoring) also gets a bump.

I would be open to other scoring change suggestions, and Chris would then need to approve any finalization, but let’s get an idea on where we stand before I waste any more time on this…

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.